The Goal Subscale Epistemology was also a significant predictor of therapist emphasis on the working alliance along the Goal subscale (e.g. client and therapist agreement on how to achieve the goals), F(2, 1093) = 4.92, p < .007 (R 2 = .009). 065) for the rationalist epistemology t(1093) = 2.16, p < .031, was in the positive direction. 075) for the constructivist epistemology t(1093) = 2.47, p < .014, was also in the positive direction along the Goal subscale. This was again inconsistent with the proposed hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology would have stronger leanings towards the Goal subscale in the therapist emphasis on working alliance compared to therapists with a constructivist epistemology.
The Bond Subscale Lastly, epistemology was also a significant predictor of the therapist emphasis on the working alliance along the Bond subscale (the development of a personal bond between the client and therapist), F(2, 1089) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .035). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = – 0.034) was in the negative direction, but was not significant, t(1089) = –1.15, p < .249. For the constructivist epistemology, the standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.179) was significant t(1089) = 5.99, p < .0001, and in the positive direction along the Bond subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology is less inclined towards therapist emphasis on working alliance on the Bond subscale than the constructivist epistemology.
Practitioners having an effective constructivist epistemology tended to lay significantly more focus on the non-public bond on the healing relationship versus therapists which have a good rationalist epistemology
The current investigation indicated that therapist epistemology is a critical predictor with a minimum of certain aspects of the working alliance. The best searching for was https://datingranking.net/de/buddhistische-datierung/ a student in regards to the development of a great private thread between the visitors and you can specialist (Bond subscale). That it supports the idea in the literary works one to constructivist therapists set an elevated increased exposure of building a quality therapeutic relationship described as, “desired, insights, faith, and you may caring.
Theory step 3-your choice of Particular Healing Treatments
The third and you may latest data was created to address the brand new prediction you to definitely epistemology will be a good predictor away from counselor entry to certain therapy process. A great deal more especially, the rationalist epistemology usually report playing with procedure of this intellectual behavioral therapy (age.grams. pointers providing) over constructivist epistemologies, and therapists which have constructivist epistemologies tend to report playing with procedure for the constructivist medication (e.grams. psychological control) more therapists which have rationalist epistemologies). A multiple linear regression research are used to determine when your predictor changeable (specialist epistemology) often influence therapist feedback of traditional variables (treatment techniques).
Epistemology was a significant predictor of cognitive behavioral therapy techniques F(2, 993) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .185). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = 0.430) was significant, t(993) = , p < .001 and in the positive direction. The standardized beta coefficient for the constructivist epistemology (? = 0.057) was significant and in the positive direction t(993) = 1.98, p < .05. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology would have stronger leanings of therapist use of cognitive behavioral techniques when conducting therapy than constructivist epistemologies.
Finally, epistemology was a significant predictor of constructivist therapy techniques F(2, 1012) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .138). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = – 0.297) was significant t(1012) = –, p < .0001 and in the negative direction. The standardized beta coefficient for the constructivist epistemology (? = 0.195) was significant t(1012) = 6.63, p < .0001, and in the positive direction. This supported the hypothesis that the constructivist epistemology would place a stronger emphasis on therapist use of constructivist techniques when conducting therapy than rationalist epistemologies.